Got a Question: Ask The Lazy E

November 4, 2008 · Print This Article

We’re gearing up for the release of our new website later that fall. One of the new features will be an “ask box” where I’ll reply to questions about green living. Here’s a question that came from Kevin in San Francisco.

Q: “What helps you determine whether or not a company is legitimately working towards a sustainable future versus someone looking to produce a few additional bucks by putting the word “green” on their product?Isn’t it a matter of interpretation?The more I look into it the more I find that green wave similar to the dot com era.”

A: Of course, there’s lots of companies trying to make themselves green. To be honest, I don’t really concern myself with attempting to decipher the “true” intentions of companies with regard to sustainability. I’m not certain that Mother Nature cares one way or the other what companies’ intentions are provided they’re taking substantive steps to integrate environmental responsibility directly into their core business operations. Many companies can (and do) write big checks to environmental non-profit organizations, but how many are really willing to commit to changing the way they actually do business? The best way to tell is to look at their products. whether they’re taking substantive steps to introduce legitimately green products – which nearly always starts with green, non-toxic materials – thereupon odds are that some serious change is underway considering to bring these kinds of products

to market requires buy-in from many areas of the company like product design, sourcing, manufacturing, and marketing. soon after I evaluate whether those products reflect consumer behavior. For example, lots of companies are touting the biodegradability of their products, but that is largely irrelevant since unless that product is eventually going down a drain or inside a composter, it most likely will never biodegrade. Nothing biodegrades in landfills considering there’s not suitable oxygen or microorganisms to enable the process. So, yes, there’s a lot of hype and less than legit claims right now, but I mostly see that as an inevitable phase through which the green economy must pass in order to achieve more concrete and widesp footing.

The dotcom era was filled with hype. But the promise of the World Wide Web was and is very real. It was only after the bubble burst and many pundits said the Web was dead that the Net truly began to convert the way humans gather data, transact commerce and communicate with one another. The future of green is bright. But there’s no doubt that we’ll continue to come across some rough patches and frustrations along the way. The more we can applaud companies for taking substantive steps in a green direction while still holding them accountable for areas in which improvement is essential, the more effective we’ll be in creating the change we want to see.

[Source] josh

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

going green earth environment climate change green planet wind power al gore kyoto protocol renewable energy land pollution pollution human nature causes of global warming tankless water heater tankless water heaters carbon dioxide cause of global warming effects of global warming earth science earth science dictionary energy star solar water heater photovoltaic recycle science news organic food wildlife national wildlife federation climate map ocean pollution conservation endangered species hybrid cars organic energy conservation bottled water composting alternative energy compost solar cell department of energy global warming greenhouse gases peak oil free energy thermal energy endangered species list recycling facts solar cells water global warming facts solar panels an inconvenient truth fuel cells consequences of global warming greenhouse effect wind energy green building popular science solar powered cars what is global warming environmental issues price of oil sustainability solar energy science magazine nature water pollution noise pollution solar dryer solar green guy hybrid car mother earth news fossil fuels carbon footprint solar power waste management genetically modified food earth day geothermal energy oil prices water heaters go green natural resources electric cars epa polar bears recycling electronic waste ecology planet earth deforestation solar panel climate graphs water conservation mother earth hybrid vehicles air pollution

Comments

Got something to say?