Breaking WIND: windmills vs. the birds
June 3, 2008 · Print This Article
Part of what an energy conference teaches professionals is how to successfully control industry PR, defend its image, etc. Just as mining companies must know how to construct themselves not look like environmental monsters for removing mountaintops, wind ability developers have to know how to reply questions from animal rights groups who argue that turbine kill large numbers of birds.
The young and idealistic wind industry wants to proceed sustainably, developing farms in safe areas and backing up its practices with peer reviewed studies that tabulate the exact impact on birds and bats. Hopefully, they can achieve that panacea. According to the DOE, the 20% by 2030 initiative is going to require 75,000 more turbines and $60B worth of new transmission lines — so even though the impacts may not be great per turbine, the overall impact is going to be substantial.
Seminars citing a new NYSERDA study were revealed today, assessing the wildlife impacts of wind turbines on wildlife. As nearly everyone expected, wind potential has the lowest impact on wildlife
- Extraction
- Transportation
- Construction
- Generation
- Transmission
- Decomission
To start with, wind doesn’t require the first two stages — so extraction and transportation don’t factor in at all. Of those last 4, wind has not been show to greatly affect the populations of birds and bats in a wind farm area. The biggest surprise that came out of the study is that hydro-power is actually a high risk resource when it comes to wildlife. Since hydro-power actually greatly effects waterways and wetland areas, they alter their surrounding ecosystems heavily. Decommissioning a hydro-power basically involves draining a man-made lake — which is not so great for the ecosystem that’s cropped up around it.
[Source] Josh Loposer
green price of oil compost energy conservation wildlife epa solar cells what is global warming waste management deforestation

















Moving dirt is “monsterous,” but killing birds is “young and idealistic?” Seriously, I get your point, but your bias is showing.